Conscience about one's OPTION II

GERMAN-Deutsch (in Bearbeitung)

Corinthian 1-33: "If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love (based on X-substance of those concerned), I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal."

Generally speaking the prefix, 'con', here specifically "of science" means you are using your personally relevant knowledge work to keep control of your OPTION II until you get an insight about the H2-superior order to L3-reframe your conscience.  Under OPTION I people use the "forbidden fruits" of the ZG-zeitgeist knowledge and leave its evolution to the way OTHERS relate to them under the limitation of %1-political correctness, in reaction to its irritation with %5-manipulation with liberating %6-projections. Or often times they appoint some master-priest-hype-ideology to take command, while their X-being with its 15 essential states are immersed under OPTION I, either in a repressive 541-GULAG in the intellectual pecking order of a predominant power or ideology such as INTER-National socialism, or in a disturbance erasing 623-KZ (concentration camp such as peer-controlled science, politics or other insubstantial discussions and social Darwinian power games of an upstart movement, such as National Socialist, fascism or a mafia). In terms of a ship's command, the captain is in control like you of your mind, until he steps back or a superior officer returns to the bridge, e.g. you being hypnotized. A captain is free to appoint another officer to take command while he wants to retreat or perform another mission. Are you free to give meaning to your OPTION II in the midst of OPTION I or has the latter swallowed the former having sold your soul short?

o-open:  Pathological behavior  stems from some inhibition about controlling part of one's substantial thinking and behavior in terms of one's OPTION II, and instead reacting to one's own disadvantage or that of others in fear of the >1 very bad, or due to >2 bad assumptions about inevitable consequences, in ignorance of what is really >5 good for all, and >6 very good for self, or >3 unsatisfactory in terms of substantial >4 peace. Avoiding or disabling the awareness of these six categories by prejudice evokes traumata or physical conditions when >qualifying one's X-existence is required. This is seen as conscious or unconscious arrogance in ignorance of the relevant H2-superior order with its G4-relationship truth. Thus a  THERAPIST  (People#1Worker#1) is required to open up otherwise lives ending unfulfilled, rather towards restoring the ability to engage in meaningful relationships through using one's innate §1-right to express what really matters in terms of one's §2-purpose in a §3-sustainable genuine and honestly conscienious way. A therapeutic relationship requires a §1-§2 rapport with a love- versus hate-coded attitude because the latter means evoking disrupting and irritating, competitive X-intervention in each other's h-living space.

e-ended: The unavoidable end *raises (rises) the  question  of how to end; unfulfilled under the insubstantial OPTION I rat race, or tuned in to one's X-innate §BHL-ethics. Here  COACHES  (People#1's Temple#0, i.e. Mind#0Master#0) offer psychological, situation specific *(of other) ways *through (of) companionship in the process of finding relevant, *desirable (ed or other kind of) answers. Thus the aim of a qualified coach is to create an opening space to be able to be supportive for the trainee *inorder to §2-work out the relevant purpose.

Good coaches care deeply about people; they have incredibly high personal standards and ambitions and perform with a high OPTION I*???) level of self- and other-knowledge.

g-generative: As soon as the purpose is clear by A-insights, and within 2 days made reproducible, decisions are required within the following 2 weeks about what to generate *(with it), i.e. what the task to be fulfilled and the goal to achieve is. Here  MENTORS  are offering their Palace#2 Master#2 and -Priest#2 services with their experience and networks to effectively deal with the  13-00 intellectual hierarchy  to become successful under OPTION I*??).

Good mentors do not take their OPTION I *(?)roles lightly. They feel invested in the success of the mentee. Usually, this requires someone who is knowledgeable, compassionate, and possesses the attributes, resources and networks of a good teacher or trainer. Excellent communication skills also are required. A good mentor is committed to helping their mentees find success and gratification in their chosen professions. Overall good mentoring requires empowering the mentee to develop their own strengths, beliefs, and personal attributes.

p-principles: In the process of interacting with the outside world of say, the market and the prevailing opinion of the target group, the necessity to use the relevant resource, tools and methods for M-manipulating the present situation into the desired ones. So at first a customer *may resort to what the ZG-zeitgeist, the market, therapists, coaches and mentors are offering within a %1-politically correct framework. That is necessary to some degree to achieve anything. However, only if the application is sufficiently congruent to one's inner relationship truth to take responsibility for one's non-negotiable >qualification of ones X-existence with one's conscience,  *which ( that) cannot be delegated or outsourced *in order to

uphold one's eustress required for synergy, based on  M / O = STRESS < DEATH . That is where People#1-, Palace#2- Temple#0-Prophets#3 come in supporting and challenging  SELF-QUALIFICATION  with their BOTTOM-UP from the substance approach *to (of) those concerned in enhancing the partner's conscience towards LifeFulfilling Platforms beyond the tasks in OPTION I MATRIX-organizations. *why does bottom up do this??

So, the choice between OPTION I based, fragmented and fragmenting knowledge work, and OPTION II based Applied Personal Science#3 APS©, is available also for you. The former, personally-neutral#2 *at (for) your free disposition#0, largely word-based hypes of scribes, with decreasing half-time, and the latter, now fully operational in oegp-whole substantial terms, based on the H2-superior order with the H4-substantial understanding of the personally relevant relationship truths.

Here are 2 examples relevant between me and X2, and with X3 real human beings with
X1=9Pv such as me, with X2=9Bp and X3=3Bm which results in the synergy-parameters

cJ/JJX hy-cM, more detailed:
L3-J#20>5 L3-J#20>5 G5-X#13>6 K623 compared to me G5-J #13>2 G5-J #13>2 L3-X #10>4 G415

ty/vMf hy-bJ, more detailed:
H1-v#22>3 §0-M#12>6 G1-f#11>4 K623 compared to me G1-v #11>3 H2-M #01>1 L3-f #21>1 K632

The exemplary core problem is highlighted in the way most Christian Churches cherish the mistaken idea that people can be made and maintained as "Christians", without their consent and appreciation of their OPTION II, merely through church rites. However, how to become a Christian, is explained in the Gospel of John in the Bible. The result of such ignorance about our true inner nature is that Infrastructure with its Electricity Grid#1, Communication based on common Language#2, *(??)up to Artificial Intelligence#0 are now arrogantly *(step missing here ?)used to make prejudices operational beyond conscience. However, all such arts, intellect, information, technology, everything just man-made M-manipulation know-how, side-track people *from (to) fulfilling their OPTION II O-orientation; without it, all the endeavors of men and women's end up *simply being *disruptive(ng each other). And that is feeding even more insubstantial discussions about strategy and Leadership in the Age of Disruption, thus taking the disruption of conscience for granted. To cover up this decaying outcome with fig leaves, the elite just politely asks to be allowed to be the devil's advocate in criticizing each other. In this way, the word of of the CREATOR, e.g. his H2-superior order and A-the inner conscience mutates into the Zeitgeist God evoking Evil Empires as people's substance is pre-trans-trapped into opinions boil*ed(ing) down *into (with) the prevailing one, into the thinking catastrophes *which are evok*ed(ing) as a consequence, human catastrophes - the topic of the Old Testament towards the resolution of the New Testament with Jesus growing beyond his human self as the king not of this world, but of his Father, the Creator, in view if the >1 very bad state of humanity with its ZG-Temple-God, Jesus doing the >5 good of opening up the B3-path which in B4-truth leads to B5-life's fulfillment with one's OPTION II.  

What remains so far is the question about the *8sis their such a thing?) right fragmentation and degree of disruption to seemingly serve clients better, and to encourage their staff to develop to serve better. And of course all that is argued in %1-politically correct ways, avoiding too much of personal challenges for the elite and managers of monetary flows, in order for them to remain relevant *at (on) the top of the economy. However, nowadays the workforce is often *as well ( no longer less) trained *as (than) their leaders, but the latter can pretend to know better how to re-skill their workers and how to sell to their clients. This way more and more people are actually getting displaced from a proper position to fulfill their OPTION II, *and (to) remain other-determined by the elite. Under OPTION I things have to become pretty bad before politics moves - usually only in the wrong direction of cementing OPTION I as a closed MATRIX where digital disruption is now incorporated in what is considered "human", as before *happened through eating the forbidden fruit, crucifixions, world wars, cannibalizing nature, social Darwinism and so on. And so people have become the pawns in the elite's power games, *which meanwhile *have become more subtle than ever. However, lifefulfilling innovation for better *ends/paths/ directions?(ways) 3and not merely fro (; not) numbers#1, *nor just for (neither just) people#2 *as (are) the prime desirable resource, but *for real human beings#3 who can grow from making mistakes, not just to survive, but for L2-timely exchange of project-oriented competence towards L3-reframing what otherwise self-destructs.

So, the choice between your OPTION I and OPTION II, to fulfill your life in your relationships, is available also for you to understand and make use of. *(after reading the above I wondered that Option II survives at all given the number of enemies it seems to have. Further above I thought you were writing Option I and meant II as what was happening seemed to be helpful - much harder text than yesterday's).