Fragmentation by intellectual shrinking

You began X-existing#3, and has given rise to opinions as you grew into your grown-up form#0. Those in turn feeds the ZG-zeitgeist towards OPTION I pre-trans-trapping wordy personally-neutral generalizations#2. They fragment people into content-free#1 target groups such as ABC-types in terms of a certain temple-marketing and palace-management approach. Thus people become insubstantial tags, digitized as "customers", "workers", "soldiers", "citizen", "male", "female" and so on. To handle each tags' cargo-cult, the relevant p-skills need to be digitized into psycho-logically zeitgeist relevant adjectives and descriptions thereof. All of that are "flying carpets" hovering with the permanently self-destructive ZG into its OPTION I virtual MATRIX. This is pre-trans-trapping existence#3 into digital forms of expressions#0, which in themselves have no substance. But they are pseudo-creating a potentially evolving virtuality when fed with people's souls thus disrupted for digestion, say as opinion with some kind of psychoanalysis, by the ZG. That is how the elite catches up with the ZG by successfully sucking people's attention from the H3-reality of Creation according to the Beelzebub strategy. The pay-off of is the corresponding mass-attractivity on the intellectual pecking order.

Surely, in your RIGHT OPTION II oegp-mindset, you have to admit, that this analysis is GOOD to creates clarity about how to >6 deal with what is very good, for you, to FULFILL your X-existence. However, the seeming formal#0 complexity of what I have just presented to you is opinionated as a >2 bad stumbling block for its ongoing self-destruction, and that is >3 unsatisfactory in the OPTION I world. Avoiding this challenge has evoked all the cancerous bureau-crazy politics, too complex for anyone to be responsible anymore; even at the abyss, the %-majority is pushing itself a step further! Hurray, without my clarification, the OPTION I show can go on until human life on Earth is thus made extinct - we are well on track! Actually this thinking catastrophe of

My X=9Pp qualifies with what is >6, about my thesis; being o-open in that direction brings me on my RIGHT B3-way, even if the mass holds the opinion in the ZG zeitgeist, that this is >3 unsatisfactory. In the e-end, this corrective, as the antithesis, even if it points in the wrong direction for me, i.e. under OPTION I, is better be considered GOOD by me as a challenge to g-generate my life with good will for my OPTION II anyway. However, that does not impress the OPTION I elite; for them my track record is >2 bad in terms of their p-principles. Following up what is GOOD for me rather then falling for the OPTION I personally-neutral temptation as my truthful synthesis, is FULFILLING. My wife Diane on the other hand, holds the thesis that >4 peace is the proof for what is RIGHT, poking with her >1 very bad antithesis as in her mind a GOOD corrective and stress test, towards allowing a more encompassing >5 really good FULFILLING synthesis. What would you suggest Samson and Delilah [Video] as a preventative mediator?

This spin is still pushing people's minds, despite the fact, that after thousands of years, this OPTION I has collapsed onto itself on Nov. 24, 2016, as it did at the end of the Roman Empire's palace rule#0 in the outer world! But then, this kind of civilization I was saved by Irish monks and went on under the Vatican temple#0. Now its inner world's fulfillment reached its final disruption as the onset of the present AGE OF DISRUPTION. It's time to model it in the RIGHT way, so people of still GOOD will for their innate OPTION II, can begin the necessary L2-timely exchange of project-oriented competence; in synergy for a sufficient L3-turnaround from OPTION I with their OPTION II FULFILLMENT.

Surely you wonder how I got the above table; not from its overwhelming Big Data's analysis! No chance with all the computers, for the OPTION I type of thinking; all Artificial Intelligence can never do it! WE cannot solve the problem in p-insubstantially dealing with what is oeg-substantial; with the same thinking used when WE created them! By the way, that is the reverse engineered trivial hype by Albert Einstein. These contributed to the cargo-cults of established science, when it comes to deal with real human systems. Real human beings are not relative and innately think in OPTION II ways unlike the established science under OPTION I, which can only come up with self-destructive systems! And it is impotent to solve the problems they impose on Earth and humanity.

Here is a minor introduction in how the framework to model human systems was worked in since 1979. It gets personally relevant and substantiated, when you know your X out of 144 possible oegp's and its >qualification. In my case X=9Pp>6, argued as >2 bad, is ignored under OPTION I as >3 unsatisfactory; the typical disqualifying reaction of cargo-cult intellectuals up to professors on top of OPTION I science about organized prejudices:

The OPTION II answer is, a theory/model, here oegp-modeling human systems beyond the intellectual shrinking of #3>#0>#2>#1, is good, when applied, leads to solutions you would not get  without it. Here is how that is worked out to respond to your serious wondering:

- The OPTION I paradigm build on the intellectual shrinking to outcompete any OPTION II understanding, is aimed at pre-trans-trapping any stressing existence#3, e.g. real human being alive. And that in such a way that human life can only %1-decently exist to the degree that it can be formalized, now digitized in simple personally-neutral#2 ways not unduly challenging the elite! People should be able to apply this paradigm as content-free#1, as a matter of course like the simple common laws of nature, with no unduly arguing disturbing the peace of the elite! In short, what does not fulfill this requirement, cannot work under OPTION I, because it should not. Ultimately that is to replace bio-, soul-logical life with p-Artificial (oeg-insubstantial) Intelligence in the possible ?0-virtuality where anything goes. Thus science and investment detaches form any interests in OPTION II real life, with the >3 dissatisfaction about any H4-understanding of the created >6 very good. This would reduce the possibility to divided people from ruling them by the mass-attractive elite easily and above that of anybody else, to keep their status in the peace of their ivory towers. Remember how Herod reacted to the mere rumor of the births of a new king, the popes to scientific discoveries, and why Europe's last and worst hundred years of the plague were made possible by suppressing the known prevention! Be reminded that the sense of wars is to keep states in debts, so that the big bankster can run their money press to rule the world, never mind any laws and collateral damages!

- Real human beings poeg-demean OPTION I before it unduly, i.e. before the point of NO return from compromising the fulfillment of their personally relevant#3 OPTION II, up to what Jesus did on the cross! HE still fulfills HIS life beyond his OPTION I death! This requires, above all dogmas, paradigms and ideologies, an inner attitude with the priority of being o-open for substantial perceptions, up to the e-end of the necessary substantial responsibility for their I-conceptualization for g-generating a fulfilled life by sufficiently being tuned into one's inner a-conscience. And that is what is >6 very good for fulfilling OPTION II.

- So if the oegp-attitude is >6 very goof for life, it's reverse pgeo is >1 very bad, i.e. evil. Now the theory suggests to use the 6 possible sequences of o,e,g as A, B, C and then sort them in alphabetical order which results in
oeg corresponds to >6 (pIa) very good, oge >5 (paI) good, eog >4 (Ipa) satisfactory, ego >3 (Iap) unsatisfactory, goe >2 (apI) bad, and geo >1 (aIp) very bad. This was sufficiently verified in real life with real people as relevant:

- The respective oegp-model means on top, that opeg-optimism (o-open marketing in view of an eg-target group), arises the egpo-interests, i.e. those who are into controlling. In short opeg-egpo; eg-target groups motivate the eg-marketing! And that shifts the attention to handle what is >6 very good, usually with a rhetorical category error to what is >3 unsatisfactory about the formal handling. In the shrinking OPTION I world that means those who try to existentially#3 qualify with marketing, missioning, standing up for what is >6 very good as their thesis, trigger those who profile the opinions#0 with a non-sequitur, i.e. fake conclusion as their antitheses, that >6, is >3 unsatisfactory, because its handling appears >3 to the sheople#1 in the mass#2, in fear of getting mobbed, and even more so by the OPTION I corrupt elite who hates undue challenges#3 of their substance behind the fig leaves/image/style in fear of losing control in their comfort zones of temples and palaces...

- So the people of a feather, with this kind of >3 prejudice about their OPTION II > 6, rather thn fulfilling it self-determined, rather flock together, other-determined, and that turns out >2 badly such when the Nazis slandered the Jews as >3 unsatisfactory existences. Meanwhile OPTION I has engulfed people to hold the prejudice as a mental virus, against any substantial existence, beginning with that of nation states such as Switzerland, p to YOU, towards the multi-cultic INTER-National-Socialism!

- This possibility of slandering up to annihilation what was in their way, was of >6 very good service to Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao & Co., to gain their position power. They eliminated whoever had a >2 bad opinion end of their cargo-cults >3 unsatisfactory scapegoating. The Peter-Principle foretells, to comfort the victims as well as the perpetrators of OPTION I, with Stress < Death, i.e. there is an upper limit for their stressful destiny for which they have sold their souls...

- But this business principle of OPTION I cargo-cults "naturally" does not tell the whole truth; it would  allow real human beings to take responsibility for their work/life balance, understanding that
STRESS = OPTION I / OPTION II. Man-ager, rather ignore that "secret" and keep at least the appearance of the stress of getting on top of OPTION I, by maintaining it and its self-destructive systems. They hold the ?0-illusion that their Social Darwinian survival is more enjoyable at the top with all the privileges than at the bottom of lesser mass-attractivity - ignoring the Peter Principles for themselves, executing it for those in their way, organizing golden parachutes for the top echelons...

Have you got a glimpse of how OPTION I marketing in target groups, politics in nations, shrinks and fragments humanity into self-destructive cargo-cults to avoid and/or overcome this malicious zeitgeist vortex?  MEPHISTOPHELES freely taken from Goethe's Dr. Faust: I am the (>1 very bad) Spirit that denies! And rightly (to the common >5 good) too; for all that does begin should rightly be destructed (for the sake of >4 peace among what emerges), run; It were better that nothing were begun. Thus everything that you call sin, destruction,  in a word, represents evil. That is my own, real element, I am part of that (>1 evil, OPTION I) power; always wanting evil and yet (as a track record in the zeitgeist) always appearing (>5) good.

Based on your OPTION II parameters, I can be specific in personal interactions in the framework outlined in this site, and more.